| Netphen, Nordrhine-Westfalen February, 2012 |
A brief examination of voluntary associations in Germany provides a stark reminder of the changing nature of American society.
Voters throughout North
Rhine Westphalia will go to the polls tomorrow morning to decide
whether to keep the current ruling coalition of Social Democrats
(SPD) and Greens in power, or to replace it with a government led by
the Conservatives (CDU). While this election offers an insight into
the mood of the local electorate during these turbulent times, a
better understanding of the true underpinnings of German society can
be gleaned from spending a few hours at the Leimbachstadion watching
the Siegen Sentinels, shooting pool with the 'Magic Queue' at JoJo's
pub, or by heading up to Dortmund or over to Munich to watch the
finals of the German Cup.
Germany has a system of clubs
called “Vereine” that allow citizens of the various cities,
townships, and hamlets that make up the German countryside to participate in groups centered around a wide variety of activities. In the sporting world, these clubs range from
well–equipped and internationally recognized organizations like
Bayern Munchen or Borussia Dortmund, to local groups that, while
nominally professional, serve more as an opportunity for interested
locals to play around and maybe make a friend or two. Although most
clubs are private they are also nominally connected to the cities
whose citizenry they serve, a special status that has allowed them to
multiply while still retaining a community-centric attitude and a
responsibility to serve. These voluntary organizations form the
backbone of German community, and, as a friend recently told me,
instill a lifelong sense of belonging and desire to seek out group
activities.
For generations, one of the greatest
strengths of the United States was a similar desire within the
American populace to congregate and form voluntary associations. It
has long been argued by historians like Arthur Schlesinger that this
tendency was a bedrock foundation for how Americans understood their
place within their country. "I have often admired the extreme skill with which the inhabitants of the United States succeed in proposing a common object for the exertions of a great many men and in inducing them voluntarily to pursue it", wrote Alexis de Tocqueville in 1840, noting how
unique this tendency was as well as the superiority of
the ground up development favored by the Americans he observed.
Unfortunately, this tendency in
American has long been in decline from the halcyon visions proffered
by de Tocqueville. The United States is no longer the “nation of
joiners” that Schlesinger described in the 1940s, but rather a
confederacy of loners. This is a long term trend that was previously
reported on by the Economist in its February 18th, 1995
edition. The article, “The Solitary Bowler”, described the
decline of membership in voluntary associations, what Senator Bill
Bradley compared to “...fish floating on the surface of a polluted
river”, focused on a dismal Harvard University publication which
noted that while bowling had increased in popularity, the overall
membership in bowling leagues had declined by 40% between 1980 and
1993. People were still participating in the same pursuits, and were
participating at greater levels, but the importance of joining or
forming a group seemed to have been deleted from the equation.
This trend has continued to today, with
a recent study of communities in Iowa finding a major decline in
voluntary participation in a variety of different kind of
associations. This includes church, political and fraternal groups,
and a finding that “small-town
Iowans on average actively participated in about one-quarter fewer
associations in 2004 than they did in 1994”. Interestingly, the
finding also implied that most participation was shifting from
active, such as regularly going to meetings, to passive, mostly
financial support. This means that the main value of these
associations, as a place for citizens to “[rub] minds as well as
elbows”, as Schlesinger put it, is declining.
To
many, this might not seem like a significant problem, but there could
be major consequences in this trend. “There
is a lot of evidence that our democracy is based on having citizens
connected with one another,” said Pamela Paxton, a sociology
professor and Population Research Center affiliate from The
University of Texas at Austin. “When we connect with one another in
associations we learn that our self interest is actually connected to
the interests of others. That gives us a conception of the public
good, common identity, and sense of common responsibility as a nation
and as citizens. Any decline in that scholars see as potentially
detrimental to democracy.”
Interesting perspective. Society is changing and groups are evolving, and we won't know if this is good or bad for a long time. In a city like Chicago, their are groups for just about any interest but the variety can make it difficult for them to remain relevant. I think another area that is having an impact on group structure is the many virtual groups that are forming. Virtual groups and social media create relationships that are wide but not deep. The value of these groups will remain to be seen. That said, innovation and change tend to always be viewed with suspicion and concern. Social experiments are often just that.
ReplyDelete